Based on your analysis of Hull and Tolman’s work, was neo-behaviorism the best response to the issue of classical S-R behaviorism? Support your position. 300 words
Hull, C. L. (1934). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy, and maze learning. Part 1.
Psychological Review, 41(1), 33-54. doi:10.1037/h0070758
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1934-02002-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Tolman, E. C. (1922). A new formula for behaviorism. Psychological Review, 29(1), 44-53.
doi:10.1037/h0070289
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1926-05857-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site