write short clear answer for the following question
KOREMATSU v. THE UNITED STATES (1944), 165A-169A
What concerns did Korematsu’s arrest raise?
Why did Justice Black say the exclusion order was constitutional?
How did this case connect with the Hirabayashi case?
How was it different?
Why did Black say the case was not a matter of racial prejudice?
How did Justice Murphy disagree?
What did he say about military decisions?
What did he say about the evidence?
What did he say about DeWitt’s explanation?
Why were Germans and Italians important to his argument?
How did Justice Jackson say Korematsu could avoid violation of the
order?
What does he say our system presumes about guilt?
What passage does he quote from the Constitution?
To what does he compare the decision?