You will write a 3-page analysis/critique of the following case under CHAPTER 10:
https://books.google.com/books?id=TNdRCgAAQBAJ&pg=PR6&lpg=PR6&dq=The+Red+Ink+of+Orange+County+WHEN+IS+IT+ETHICAL+FOR+PUBLIC+TREASURERS+TO+GAMBLE+WITH+PUBLIC+MONEY?+ONLY+WHEN+YOU+WIN!&source=bl&ots=7YHT9d0cK6&sig=piHgoCGUaWwfgOB7l92-Q6Tt2b8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjzsuG84rXNAhVTgx4KHbHTC-0Q6AEIITAA#v=onepage&q=The%20Red%20Ink%20of%20Orange%20County%20WHEN%20IS%20IT%20ETHICAL%20FOR%20PUBLIC%20TREASURERS%20TO%20GAMBLE%20WITH%20PUBLIC%20MONEY%3F%20ONLY%20WHEN%20YOU%20WIN!&f=false
There should be 4 identified sections: Facts, and then Decision; and then Solutions; and then; Conclusion.
Please use Chicago/Turbian for any citations.
Under Facts, you must point out major factors in the article.
Under Decisions, you must point out any major decisions that were made in the article.
Under Solutions, you must address if the decisions were good, and address one alternative solution to the case(include 2 scholarly citations).
Under Conclusion, summarize the article from previous sections.
