This is my topic question.
Back in August of 1945, President Truman gave the United States Military orders to drop two atomic bombs in Japan. One in Nagasaki, and one in Hiroshima.
Why did President Truman believe this was the only reasonable option at the time and how did his decision affect the lives of the American soldiers?
My paper consist on the following:
Specify, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Articulate how different historical lenses impact how people perceive an historical event. A. Explain how historical lenses could be applied to your topic. For instance, are there aspects of this event that might interest a political historian and what are they? B. Choose one of the lenses referenced above, and detail how the historical narrative you started in your research and introduction might change through this lens. For instance, how might the “story” of your event change when studied through its political aspects? C. Discuss what conclusions you can draw about the “telling” of history in relation to the “teller.” How does this impact for you what “history” is? Be sure to back up your opinions with information learned throughout the course. II. Based on your conclusions, articulate the value of studying history. A. Describe how you could apply to our lives today what you have learned from the event you have studied. Be sure to reference specific contemporary issues. For instance, what specific issues that we encounter today could benefit from lessons learned from your event? B. Discuss your opinion of the adage that “history repeats itself.” Do you agree or disagree? Be sure to explain why you have this opinion with information you have learned throughout the course. C. Discuss your obligation as a citizen of your society to understanding the history behind issues that impact you every day. For instance, what civic duties you can be better at if you know more about their history? How can being a more informed member of society benefit you and society?
