I’m working on a film writing question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/community.28149070?se…
THIS IS THE ARTWORK!!!
A student will write an analysis on one of the assigned artworks online, which are part of the permanent collection of
the University Art Museum. A list of the artworks will be announced in myCourses at least 3 weeks before the due of
the paper.
An analysis should discuss on formal elements, which include the visual composition, colors, contrast, shapes and
lines, textures, size, a possible process, and materials used on the artwork, along with techniques. Do not focus on the
subject matter.
There is no particular writing style I would request you to follow, but please keep it formal, not casual. The paper
should focus on your analysis on a chosen artwork – do not write why you have chosen this artwork over others, and do
not write an intro or conclusion, as I am not asking you to generalize or summarize the main concept of the artwork.
Finally, do not include any quotations and do not do any research on the artist or artwork – we want to hear only your
own interpretations and analysis of the artwork. However, you can do research on techniques/methods if you are not
familiar with (e.g., collage, lithography, monotype, photography, etc.).
RUBRIC :
|
Categories
|
Excellent |
Good
|
Fine |
Not Good
|
|
A number of formal
|
The paper analyzes at least Example of formal elements are: lines (thickness, length, straight/curve, dashed line, etc.), shapes, colors/shades, contrast, texture, overall visual composition
(symmetricity/asymmetricity, cluster, use of empty space,
repetition, variation, etc.), movements/speed, space, medium/materials (paint, use of canvas, papercut for collage, etc.), space, techniques/a process of making the artwork (layering paints, print- making, photography, etc.), etc. = 3% points |
The paper analyzes = 2% points |
The paper analyzes = 1% points |
The paper analyzes = 0% point |
|
Objectiveness (non-
|
The analysis is free from any Example of non-subjective Example of subjective |
The analysis is |
The analysis is |
The analysis is not |
|
|
= 5 – 6% points |
= 3 – 4.5% points |
= 1 – 2.5% points |
= 0 – 0.5% points |
|
Persuasiveness of |
The analysis is explained Example of persuasive Example of not persuasive = 5 – 6% points |
The analysis is = 3 – 4.5% points |
The analysis needs = 1 – 2.5% points |
The analysis does = 0 – 0.5% points |
|
Originality of the |
The analysis is original and = 2% points |
The analysis is = 1% point |
The analysis is = 0.5% points |
The analysis may be = 0% point |
|
Fulfillment of the |
The paper meets all the = 2% points |
The paper does not = 1.5% points |
The paper does not = 1% point |
The paper does not = 0% point |
|
Grammar, structure, |
The paper has less than or A well written paper should
|
The paper has less = 0.5% points |
The paper has = 0% point |
