REPLY POSTS:
Reply separately to two of your classmates posts (See attached classmates posts, post#1 and post#2).
When replying to your peers, think about the ethical considerations related to research or working with a vulnerable population. Although the vulnerable share characteristics making them susceptible to health concerns, they remain unique.
In the initial post (see attachment, mine was about “combat veterans”), everyone discussed both strengths and weaknesses inherent to a specific vulnerable population.
What steps would you recommend to ensure that your peer’s vulnerable group is ethically protected throughout the research as well as the participation element of a community-based participatory research project; that is, shelter services, food banks, case management, support groups, etc.?
– Use at least two scholarly references per peer post. In your reply posts, include how the information you learned from your peer’s post will help you to provide care to a patient as a Nurse Practitioner.
Note: The expectation is not that you “agree” or “disagree” with your peers but that you develop a conversation with information that is validated via citations to encourage learning and to bring your own perspective to the conversation.
Please, send me the two documents separately, for example one is the reply to my peers Post #1, and the other one is the reply to my other peer Post #2.
Please, keep in mind these are replies.
TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT (FREE OF PLAGIARISM)
Note: My background for you to have as a reference: I am currently enrolled in the Psych Mental Health Practitioner Program, I am a Registered Nurse, I work at a Psychiatric Hospital, where I also work with this vulnerable population.
