Case study- critique an article in nursing theory x 3 (due 24 hours)

1) Minimum 3 full pages

                Part 1: minimum 1 page

                Part 2: minimum 1 page

                Part 3: minimum 1 page

Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms, please use headers

            All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

            Bulleted responses are not accepted

            Dont write in the first person 

            Dont copy and pase the questions.

            Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

           Submit 1 document per part

3) It will be verified by Turnitin and SafeAssign

4) Minimum 2 references per part, not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question.

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc 

______________________________________________

Part 1:  Pamela Reed – Theory of Self-Transcendence 

1) Please select an article that addresses Pamela Reed – Theory of Self-Transcendence and submit the article.

2) Write a critique on the article.

Part 2:  Patricia Liehr and Mary Jane Smith – Story Theory

1) Please select an article that addresses Patricia Liehr and Mary Jane Smith – Story Theory and submit the article.

2) Write a critique on the article.

Part 3:  Nola J. Pender – Health Promotion Model

1) Please select an article that addresses Nola J. Pender – Health Promotion Model and submit the article.

2) Write a critique on the article.

_______________________________________________________________

Check:

Here are some crucial aspects:

It is not a summary. 

You do not need simply to list the points and problems discovered in the source. The main idea is to critique them. This is actually why the assignment has its name;

Another common mistake students make is delivering heir impression instead of arguments to support their point of view. You need to focus on clear evidence and back them up; Do not concentrate on the main idea only. Every event has the cause and result. So, you need to provide the background in addition to the purpose of your critiques.