1.NOTE: Consult the Harding and Singer video’s in preparation for this discussion forum:
Garrett Hardin and Peter Singer offer dramatically different vies on the obligation of nations and individuals to intervene to alleviate world hunger and poverty. While each author offers numerous arguments to bolster their respective views, in general, which author’s position to you find most appealing? Explain why. Is there a middle ground that might be derived from insights provided by each author’s position?
