Please follow the instructions on the attached rubric to complete the assignment
Please, no plagiarized work
Research evaluating 360-degree feedback systems tends to demonstrate superior outcomes to more traditional performance assessments. 360-degree systems rely upon multiple points of evaluation including supervisors, peers, self-rating, subordinates, computer-based ratings, and in some instances outside sources such as customers or clients. Discuss the advantages of a multi-rater system to improve evaluation of leaders and subordinates. Examine the challenges of the 360-degree feedback system especially considering how to increase rater agreement, frame-of-reference, and how to ensure raters know what behaviors and characteristics comprise effective performance. Lastly, analyze the future of 360-degree feedback and the inclusion of computer-based assessment within a 360-degree feedback system.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments.
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Write an essay (1,750-2,000 words) in which you will analyze the 360-degree feedback system. In your essay address the following:
1. Examine the advantages of tjhe 360-degree feedback system.
2. Evaluate the impact of 360-degree feedback on leadership style from a theoretical perspective of leadership.
3. Discuss an empirical examination that challenges the 360-degree feedback system.
4. Evaluate current and proposed sources of information within 360-degree feedback.
STUDY MATERIALS
Jabrayilov, R., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2016). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory in individual change assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 559-572. doi:10.1177/0146621616664046
URL:
http://journals.sagepub.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1177/0146621616664046
De Champlain, A. F. (2010). A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Medical Education, 44(1), 109-117. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03425.x
URL:
Whittaker, T. A., & Worthington, R. L. (2016). Item response theory in scale development research: A critical analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(2), 216-225. doi:10.1177/0011000015626273
URL:
http://journals.sagepub.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1177/0011000015626273
Sinharay, S. (2016). Person fit analysis in computerized adaptive testing using tests for a change point. Journal Of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(5), 521-549. doi:10.3102/1076998616658331
URL:
http://journals.sagepub.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.3102/1076998616658331
Lu, H., Hu, Y., Gao, J., & Kinshuk. (2016). The effects of computer self-efficacy, training satisfaction and test anxiety on attitude and performance in computerized adaptive testing. Computers & Education, 100, 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.012
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131516301014
